Information Technology - Questions to be answered Essay

Data Technology - Questions to be replied - Essay Example Master frameworks (by and large all emblematic frameworks) and neural systems are two rival ways to deal with Artificial Intelligence, both having distinctive application territories inside this extension. master framework configuration may take a long time of social occasion data and testing. Then again, a neural system might be planned and prepared in a couple of days after most models related with the space are accumulated. A decent dependable guideline is if the principles are not all around characterized and there is a ton of preparing information at that point utilize neural system approach. On the off chance that there are no models accessible, at that point a traditional master framework approach might be taken. Aside from this, there are obviously other rules for choosing which way to deal with follow: Master framework innovation is a full grown and very much communicated innovation which is as of now accessible. it very well may be expressed that the longing for expanded information has brought master frameworks out of the exploration research facilities into the workplace. Master frameworks are acceptable at procedural sorts of issues, for example, system, booking, and instructing. They are better than manuals since they ask the client just applicable data, they fuse past understanding into taking care of the issue, and they answer inquiries regarding their thinking procedure [17]. Information warehousing can guarantee that an organization stays beneficial as... 2. Summarize how an information stockroom may turn into an endurance issue for an organization Information warehousing can guarantee that an organization stays productive as it can support organizations and buyers slice through the pursuit and offer an increasingly important assistance to both customer and business, or they can be utilized so as to hurt the business, the purchaser or both. With this conceivably enormous force comes huge duty. Organizations that decide to participate in information warehousing exercises ought to have set up a specialized group for execution, yet additionally a sound information security strategy just as a moral use strategy. These arrangements ought to be made accessible to the customers whose data is put away inside the stockroom. The accompanying table sums up the seven fantasies and counter-legends examined in this paper, sorted out by an incentive to the shopper, business and society all in all. Source: (Joseph Cazier and Ryan LaBrie, 7 Myths of Common Data Warehousing Practices: An assessment of purchaser, business and cultural worth. 2003) 3. ERP, CRM and other behemoth applied data frameworks speak to behemoth physical frameworks. Look into whether such behemoth calculated frameworks hinder an association's physical framework and its capacity to be deft The expression coordinated association alludes to an association that can react in an ongoing enough manner to circumstances that sway the wellbeing and prosperity of the associations and its partners. Turning out to be spry commonly includes a mix of procedure re-designing just as the arrangement of utilization, framework and the executives abilities with the objective of removing time and cost from business forms, while improving the nature of these

Fine and Gross Motor Skills Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Fine and Gross Motor Skills - Research Paper Example Childcare implies guaranteeing that the condition the infant is experiencing childhood in is sheltered and solid enough for the kid and this is crafted by guardians, watchmen, grandparents and different family members, sitters or even caretaker, authorized youngster care focuses just as more established kin. In any event, when the guardians are working and need to leave the youngster with others who are proficient, they should in any case guarantee that the earth is protected and sound for the kids and impart the equivalent to those dealing with the kids. What ought to be considered before leaving the youngster with just anybody is the connection of that individual with the infant, the tidiness and wellbeing of the earth, exercises the kid can take an interest in, the food and refreshments being given and whether they are sound enough just as how the individual participates in exercises with the kids. In the event that the staff or individual doesn't look glad to interface, at that p oint the youngster won't have enough improvement with that person. What a few guardians don't understand with regards to perusing to kids is that it is never too soon to do as such. The previous the perusing and recurrence the more the child begins learning jargon just as getting their synapses invigorated to develop. The child likewise begins getting and fortifying listening aptitudes just as picking up memory abilities. Perusing additionally advances holding with the youngster with the calming hints of a parent’s voice. The child additionally begins getting familiarity with the world notwithstanding starting a perusing society in them. Distinctive age bunches have diverse perusing books just as limit they can comprehend. Their focus range increments with age and consequently just a couple of pages ought to be perused at once and increment as the kid creates. The nearness of creatures and drawings in a baby’s book helps in learning while at the same time urging them to rehash as you read alongside them fabricates their certainty and perusing abilities as they grow up and start pre-school.

What different views of the Duke are presented in acts 1-3 Free Essays

Written in the mid seventeenth century, ‘Measure for Measure’ was one of the numerous plays that Shakespeare wrote to engage his King, which at the time was James I. Shakespeare utilized this play to introduce his own perspectives on the King, and his goals of a King through his introduction of the Duke Vincentio. A more mind boggling character than first accepted, Shakespeare changes the Duke all through the play. We will compose a custom exposition test on What various perspectives on the Duke are introduced in acts 1-3? or on the other hand any comparable point just for you Request Now As the Duke set out on a journey to get away from the weights of his job, yet to gain from his encounters and get himself. The Duke is the principal individual to talk; this is one of Shakespeare’s regular strategies to demonstrate who he considers generally significant in the play. Regardless of whether apparently the story develops around the character of Angelo, under the surface it is clear that the Duke is the impetus behind everything. Toward the beginning of the play we see that the Duke is a man with general ethics, commending the individuals under him. This is Shakespeare demonstrating us from the beginning that he wants the Duke to be viewed as a decent man. In the main scene we discover that for the leader of a city he loathes being in the open eye, â€Å"I love the individuals, however don't prefer to arrange me to their eyes†. This statement likewise gives us that he is a respectable and caring Duke as he cherishes his kin, however he doesn’t have the certainty to declare his position. In the start of the play the perspective on the Duke is defined to be that he is pleasant yet somewhat cowardly; permitting his lanes to be loaded up with transgression, â€Å"bawds†, â€Å"thief’s†. To re-uphold the feeling that Duke is noteworthy, Shakespeare causes the Duke to acknowledge shortcoming for the express that the town is in, â€Å"’twas my deficiency to give the individuals scope†, despite the fact that he still doesn’t take care of business. At the point when the Duke is conversing with Pompey in act three scene two, we see an alternate character rising. From his ‘real life’ experience he seems to have accumulated certainty and is starting to give indications of power, he considers Pompey a â€Å"wicked bawd† to disclose to him how frustrated he was with him. Anyway these freshly discovered desires must be stifled as he is under the pretense of the Friar, so he utilizes strict references to voice his sentiments rather, † if the fiend have given thee proofs for sin†¦Ã¢â‚¬ . Shakespeare utilizes refrain here to underline the earnestness as it is progressively cadenced and underscored by the worries in the line because of predictable rhyming. Before the finish of act three, the Duke is practically prepared to take the rules back of Angelo, as he has arrived at a point where he comprehends what a pioneer ought to be, and has assembled the information and certainty to stand up for himself; â€Å"He who the blade of paradise will bear ought to be as heavenly as severe†. In Shakespeare’s time, Kings were the nearest thing to Gods and consequently must be impeccable good examples. Here the Duke is stating that they ought to be consummately adjusted; as great and good as they are severe. Anyway the Duke shows a darker side of him, maybe the slight edge of frigidity expected to lead effectively, yet in any case the Duke makes his own delight while under the pretense of the Friar to control the characters to do his arrangement. In spite of the fact that this was done to profit his kin, as he secured the practically honest and furthermore show the liable a thing or two. Shakespeare intentionally controls the audience’s assessment o the Duke all through the play as the character himself changes radically from beginning to end. Right off the bat we see his understudies having incredible regard for him, â€Å"always faithful to your grace’s will†. Anyway in act three it turns out to be obvious to the crowd that the townspeople just like him since they are permitted to do however they see fit. The character of Lucio embodies the sentiments of the townspeople when he tells the Duke himself, (camouflaged as the monk) that he doesn’t question the knowledge or respect of the Duke, calling him â€Å"wise†; albeit likewise alluding to him as, â€Å"Avery shallow, oblivious, unweighing fellow†. In this manner explaining that the townspeople don’t know the Duke and also that the Duke doesn’t know them, â€Å"ignorant†. There is banter anyway that Lucio knows that is the Duke and is intentionally utilizing this to voice his actual assessments of him, or maybe simply for his own beguilement as Lucio is a joker type character. Anyway it could be countered by saying this is unreasonably shrewd for Lucio and this is just a comedic scene as Lucio is ‘putting his foot in his mouth’. Shakespeare causes the Duke to talk in section here, filling various needs; right off the bat since it is increasingly loose as the scene is a parody. Besides on the grounds that it is a scene to move the narrative of the play on and stanza would take to long. We likewise assemble the character of Escalus’ assessment of the Duke while he is as yet masked, in spite of the fact that it is extraordinary complexity to Lucio’s. The character of Escalus shows up as the shrewd old backer, calling attention to straight away one of the key subjects of the whole play and furthermore one of the principle reasons that the Duke remained in isolation; â€Å"above all different hardships fought particularly to know himself†. It is additionally discussed that Escalus knew about the camouflage and knew precisely what he was doing, yet for this situation it is bound to be the situation, as Escalus is the ‘right-hand-man’. This hypothesis is strengthened by the way that Escalus at that point praises the Duke, realizing that noteworthy the way that the Duke’s inward most feelings of trepidation are noticeable to another person, he gives a sofa-bed, â€Å"Rather celebrating to see another joyful, than cheerful at anything which purported to make him rejoice†. Implying that the Duke would prefer to see others glad than be cheerful himself. I feel that the genuine assessment of the Duke lies some place in the middle of Lucio’s and Escalus’ sees, as he was uninformed of the townspeople, anyway he is shrewd and exceptionally mindful, appeared by they way he manages Angelo toward the finish of the play. Step by step instructions to refer to What various perspectives on the Duke are introduced in acts 1-3?, Papers

The Sound of a Lot of Furious Crying Moving Past the Present in The Sound and the Fury and Thomas Pynchons The Crying of Lot 49 - Literature Essay Samples

It is fitting to discuss the recollection of the past in an age advancing to an unknown futurity and whose memories are increasingly banished to the realm of the nostalgic or, even worse, obsolete. Thomas Pynchon and William Faulkner, in wildly contrasting ways, explore the means by which we, as individuals and communities, remember, recycle, and renovate the past. Retrospection is an inevitability in their works, for the past is inescapable and defines, if not dominates, the present.Pynchon maintains an optimistic, Ovidian view of the past we recycle our cultural memories into another, perhaps better, form. The resulting disordered array of culture, one as much filled in by the glut of contemporary television channels as by 17th-century revenge dramas, is organized by some supervisory principle. Much as the postal system orders geography into specific postal codes and zones, Maxwells Demon in The Crying of Lot 49 connects the world of thermodynamics to the world of information flow (106); it applies a controlled, scientific objective to the sprawling, aesthetic subjective.But Pynchons culture is not one haunted by the ghosts, except for the ghosts in Hamlet and Scooby-Doo. Faulkners landscape is tortured by the tragedy of the South. In his view, the land is cursed because of two of the white mans presumptions: that he could own other men, and that he could own the land. Focusing on the microcosm of the fallen Compson family, Faulkner details the extent to which various family members are saddled by past loss and how they confront their searing memories. In what has canonized The Sound and the Fury, Faulkner recreates the temporal confusion of the Compsons in the narrative, as well, through a non-sequential chronology and through sentences that combine past, present, and future tenses. Despite the occupational differences between the two authors, they share a surprising wealth of concerns, namely in the ordering of chaos. Pynchons order, however, re mains a fruitful one of universality and coherence, while Faulkner contends that there is no real possible way to order memory, that each event is singular (indeed, he wanted the different times of the novel printed in corresponding colors), and that loss permeates the present despite attempts at reassessment or separation of the past.The first sentence of The Crying of Lot 49 introduces Mrs Oedipa Maas (9). Her name immediately and forcefully conjures up for the reader all the cultural baggage associated with the name Oedipa. It is, of course, the Latinate feminine of Oedipus, the tragic Greek hero who was fated to murder his father and sleep with his mother. Yet the female version of Oedipus is not Oedipa, but Electra. The obvious Freudian associations dare the reader into a (most likely pointless) psychoanalytic reading. Her name is not so much about psychological complexes as about language, and how language can act for the character. Oedipa also has pa within the name, bu t that is directly followed by the Ma in Maas. Furthermore, the initials of Mrs Oedipa Mass spell out MOM. Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, her husbands nickname for her is Oed, or the abbreviations of the Oxford English Dictionary. This is what Oedipa is, a dictionary of various etymologies whose roots we uncover. Postmodernism often does away with traditional characterization at the expense of names because of all the name can offer us through its etymological past. There is nothing sinister about this recycling; it is simply a mode of cultural awareness, a way to recycle the chaotic past into some sort of organized present.Names in Faulkner carry with them the literal and figurative pronunciations of their forebears. Consider the following exchange in Benjys memory:Your name is Benjy, Caddy said. Do you hear. Benjy. Benjy.Dont tell him that, Mother said. Bring him here.Caddy lifted me up under the arms.Get up, Mau I mean Benjy, she said. (39)Benjy was named Maury , after his uncle but, as Faulkner tells us in the index, when at last even his mother realised what he was and insisted weeping that his name must be changed, was rechristened Benjamin (213). Rechristening is a euphemistic term for what many of the Compsons try for in vain, the purging of their dark past in hopes for a second chance at baptism. But he is no longer even Benjamin; that seems too adult a name for his childlike status. This is not the only instance of a disastrous choice of names. Caddy names her daughter after her brother, Quentin. Jason, tormented by both his sister, for her escape and promiscuity, and by his brother, for his escape to Harvard and the ensuing financial detriment to the family (and preventing Jason from attending college), treats the female Caddy as her mothers daughter, with cruelty and barbarity. Making up for the losses extracted from him by her mother and by Quentin, he creates a loss for her by bilking her of the money her mother sends her (a tangible inheritance) and forbidding any contact between the two (a more emotional inheritance). Unlike in Pynchon, the name in Faulkner is burdened, not burnished, by memorial associations.Nevertheless, these associations are ubiquitous in TCL49, with high and low cultural artifacts meshing together in a grand equation of cultural consciousness. For Pynchon, the collective cultural memory recognizes little difference between a museum of abstract, intellectual art and the stored experience of a concrete, dirty mattress. All gets conflated to one, as with one of the many catalogs of seemingly disparate items in the book:clipped coupons promising savings of 5 or 10 cents, trading stamps, pink flyers advertising specials at the markets, butts, tooth-shy combs, help-wanted ads, Yellow Pages torn from the phone book, rags of old underwear or dresses that were period costumesall the bits and pieces coated uniformly, like a salad of despair, in a gray dressing of ash, condensed exhau st, dust, body wastes (14)What a clipped coupon and a deteriorating piece of underwear have in common is that they are both refuse, that they are both coated uniformly with the markers of decay, that their shared heritage is one of waste. In fact, the acronym W.A.S.T.E. courses through the novel, and not only for the effect of mystery. The acronym gives new meaning to a word (in this case, it stands for We Await Silent Tristeros Empire), infusing its letters with rich language while simultaneously obscuring its past incarnations as a single word. Similar meanings are grafted onto Muchos radio station, KCUF (a curse reversed), and to the C.I.A. (not for Central Intelligence Agency, but for Conjuracià ³n de los Insurgents Anarquistas). Indeed, the term anarchist miracle refers to a chaotic dance does not burst into collisions but that some unthinkable order pervades of music, many rhythms, all keys at once, a choreography in which each couple meshed easy, predetermined (131). M axwells Demon assigns order to the seemingly untamable, giving random pieces of information spatial organization, just as the postal system supervises the geographic sprawl of society. This organization, culling from the past to produce a new, ordered present, lends an optimistic air to cultural recycling, as exemplified by the tasty dandelion wine and its graver roots: You see, in spring, when the dandelions begin to bloom again, the wine goes through a fermentation. As if they remembered' (98). Oedipa denies this meaning, but Pynchon implies that the world does function in this way, taking the scraps of refuse and reformulating them as something utile, even consumable.The cultural residue in Faulkner is of a far more pessimistic nature. Taken in conjunction with T.S. Eliots The Wasteland, The Sound and the Fury critiques the sterility of a non-ritualized modern society. Eliots poem demonstrates a fear of rain, of a fertile land in which April is the cruellest month and Winter kept us warm. The desiccated landscape provides a retreat for the individual against the march of time (since fertility and seasonal rituals are abolished) and has settled over the South:The day dawned bleak and chill, a moving wall of gray light out of the northeast which, instead of dissolving into moisture, seemed to disintegrate into minute and venomous particles, like dust that, when Dilsey opened the door of the cabin and emerged, needled laterally into her flesh, precipitating not so much a moisture as a substance partaking of the quality of thin, not quite congealed oil. (165)Only Dilseys outsider status (from the Compson family, at least), the quality that will make her and the other blacks endure, as Faulkner writes in the Appendix, turns the dust of death into a somewhat liquid state. The novels many losses of family members, of innocence, of money, of land, of manhood (Benjys castration) turn into one overpowering symptom of sterility, of a land stuck in the past a nd unwilling to engage the future. Even the title comes from a line in Macbeth, pointing not only to the novels tragic structure but to its associations with the high culture of the past (ironically, ambition, that most future-oriented of drives, is the major theme of Shakespeares play).With this harmful past to work from, it is no wonder that the Compson family has such trouble mining any good from its memory banks. Each of the three brothers narratives negotiates in a different, and equally destructive, manner with the past. Benjys narrative blends all times together in a disordered, fragmented style. Unable to distinguish between times, Benjy is reduced to, as much as his retarded development limits him to, a child-like state of perception. What is the cause and what is the effect is negligible seeing the world in a temporal blur is akin to seeing it as an infant. Quentin, on the other hand, more logically perceives the past but to an extreme. He is mired in the past, co nsumed with Caddys loss of virginity, with the pasture that was sold to send him to Harvard, with his uncaring father, and with the minute clicking away of his watchs hands. This Hamlet-like absorption in the past sends him to his suicide, through which he continually steps in his own deathly shadow. The losses of the past negate any sort of future for him, and prove as unsuccessful a strategy as Benjys time warp. Finally, Jason proceeds through life as if the past were nonexistent. However, he, too, cannot escape memory, and must face the legacies of both Quentin and Caddy in the 17-year-old Caddy. That he tries to shackle her promiscuity also suggests his aversion to a fertile future, and squeezes Jason into the condensed middle of the present, an unbearable one which cannot help but notice the fading past and deteriorating future. The Compson family ultimately stands as a microcosm of ante-bellum South, showcasing the various approaches Southerners used for their own tragic , enduring history.The individual in TCL49 also sifts through his cultural stock, but for better use. Characters act in way they doubtless learned from watching the TV (108). Similarly, they react emotionally to popular culture as they would to other humans:But Roseman had also spent a sleepless night, brooding over the Perry Mason television program the evening before, which his wife was fond of but toward which Roseman cherished a fierce ambivalence, wanting at once to be a successful trial lawyer like Perry Mason and, since this was impossible, to destroy Perry Mason by undermining him. (18)As with star-struck fans who confuse actors with their screen personae, Roseman, and the rest of media-saturated America, receives its reality from culture, and not only from the contemporary culture of Perry Mason, but from the cultural pastiche behind the show: previous lawyer shows, previous legal plays and movies (the quality of mercy scene from Merchant of Venice, for instance, as much as 12 Angry Men) and the legal system itself, from our society to the Greeks. Perry Mason is not simply Perry Mason; he is a mongrel blend of Portia, Henry Fonda, and Hammurabi. The individual is swallowed up in the whole, as with the group therapy sessions to which Oedipa travels in a car pool. Encountering collective pain in a collective transport, the element becomes the whole, just as Benjy, Quentin, and Jason become the Compson family, which, in turn, becomes the South.The structure of each book mirrors its approach to the past. A typical Faulknerian word is undishonored, used in the phrase as yet undishonored. He also writes sentences such as She did not yet know she was a woman. In both cases, there is negation (undis/did notknow) that precludes knowledge in the present and only allows it in future retrospection. It is the same principle behind having Benjy sparely relate in the opening scene They were hitting, having the word caddie spiral him off into thoughts of Ca ddy, and then understanding later in the book that the company was playing golf. In the same way that the hectic present can only be understood through the steadier lens of the future, the scattered past can only be understood through the (somewhat) more stable perception of the present. The Sound and the Fury must be read several times until the disorder of narrative coheres as an intelligible story. TCL49, too, is a mystery whose willful obfuscation and numerous red herrings add up only after a few readings, and whose solution never really appears, except for the mystery of the title in the final sentence. Some critics read the title of Faulkners novel as a challenge to the reader, in that, as a tale told by an idiot, signifying nothing, the book defies traditional literary understanding. Faulkner ends the novel with Benjy howling, fulfilling the line from Macbeth, but after that has an image of order. The form of narrative, and not the content of life, is the only chance fo r order in the world. A new framing device of literary technique replaces the conventional teleological frame. The novel moves from Good Friday to Easter, from the innocence of Benjys opening section to the omniscience of Faulkners (or Dilseys) concluding section. While Perry Mason and Benjys howl seemingly signify nothing, the precision of authorial control reveals the deep material of the past in each novel from which we can attribute meaning.

Death Is Just The End - 1276 Words

â€Å"What is the meaning of life?† This a question that we hear quite often. Many people search their entire lives looking for the answer. It is a question that has stumped philosophers, humbled the wise, and opened the imagination of our youth. On the contrary, a question that we don’t hear as often would be, â€Å"what is the meaning of death?†. In order to answer this, we have to notice the fact that life and death are two separate things that work cohesively in two ways. The first is that one’s life is what will make their death so meaningful. We also see the opposite of this, where one’s death is what makes their life so meaningful. This is seen when looking at Jesus’ life and death in the book of Mark. Contrary to the believe that death is†¦show more content†¦Ã¢â‚¬Å"Just after breathing his last breath on the cross a centurion man stated â€Å"Truly, this man was God’s son!’† (Harper Collins, 1756-57). Th is man was the first person of many to become a believer because of Jesus’ death. We see this trend continued three days later Jesus was resurrected as promised and people realized who he really was. After resurrecting he appears to the disciples and says â€Å"Go into all the world and proclaim the good news to the whole creation.† (Harper Collins, 1758). Without dying and resurrecting his life wouldn’t be seen as any more significant than anyone else’s. He wouldn’t have given the disciples any reason to spread the good news and therefore wouldn’t have had a lasting effect on people even to this day. An example that shows the relationship between life and death in the opposite direction is Vivian Bearing in the movie Wit. This movie is about a woman named Vivian Bearing who has stage four ovarian cancer. As part of her treatment she agrees to be a part of a testing treatment that is new and has very low chance of being successful. Throughou t the movie we learn that she was extremely intelligent especially when it came to literature and had a passion for learning and teaching. Although she was very strict on her students, she wanted them to reach their fullest potential when it came to academics and demanded a

Speech and Deception in John Miltons Paradise Lost Essay

Speech and Deception in Miltons Paradise Lost Rhetoric and sophistry testify to the fact that the world in which we live is a world of speech, that the clever man can compose at will in order to trick others. 1 Speech was perhaps the most important medium for Milton. As a blind poet, his lack of visual faculties was augmented by a renewed importance on auditory paths to enlightenment, especially the communicative. Therefore, contemplation of dialogue in Paradise Lost becomes an essential tool for developing a correct understanding of the characters, as Milton would have intended. Nowhere is this truer than with the character of Satan. Throughout the text, his rhetoric exists as a window to the nature of his†¦show more content†¦In addition, here, as throughout much the poem, Satan continues to hedge the other side of the argument, insisting that he isnt forced to do evil by opposing God, but that to do ill our sole delight (160). This belief that he has a choice in the matter is tied up in the misconception that he was, and continues to be, equal to God, as reason hath equalld (248) them. Quite to the contrary, Milton makes it clear that the will And high permissio n of all-ruling Heaven Left him at large to his own dark designs (211-3). And it is only Satans perverted sense of reason that convinces him that The mind is its own place, and in itself Can make a Heavn of Hell, a Hell of Heavn (254-5). He believes that his reason and contemplation will help him discover How overcome this dire Calamity (189), or failing that, change his will such that it fits his current circumstance. This is the classic method of the delusional and disenfranchised, holding out hope for change, but at the same time putting forth the belief that the current situation can actually be beneficial. The sophistry has shown through Satans speech, as he declares that there is no way for God to beat him, in his mind, when we know he is already defeated. Perhaps even more telling are the conversations Satan has with himself. Modern thinkers rightfully consider of great importance the times when man speaks to parts of his ownShow MoreRelatedJohn Milton Opens Paradise Lost Essay2170 Words   |  9 Pages As John Milton opens Paradise lost with a brief explanation of his intent, he makes a very ambitious statement of his goal, claiming that his book would be sufficient means by which â€Å"[He might] assert Eternal Providence, / And justify the ways of God to men† (Paradise Lost 1.25-26). So the reader should treat his epic poem as the attempted justification that it is, and ask themselves this: does this argument successfully justify God’s ways? A key—perhaps even the key—part of Milton’s book, and thereforeRead More Discuss Milton’s presentation of Satan in Paradise Lost Essay2739 Words   |  11 PagesDiscuss Milton’s presentation of Satan in Paradise Lost There has been considerable critical interest in the figure of Satan in Paradise Lost, and in the possibility that he may be the true hero of the epic poem. The opening of the poem finds Milton in a tough spot: writing an epic poem without an epic hero in sight. In order to achieve a rationally balanced poem, he wants to let the first half rise from Hell through Chaos and towards Heaven, thereby balancing the fall of humankind in theRead More Sin and Death in John Miltons Paradise Lost Essay2270 Words   |  10 PagesSin and Death in Paradise Lost      Ã‚  Ã‚   Abstract: Death assumes in his original argument, with most readers of Paradise Lost, that Satan is all bad, having rejected God, and presumably that his charisma is illusory. Sin assumes, with Empson, that Satans entire career, including his corruption of Eve, is the project of an all-powerful and sinister God. By the time Satan gets to Mt. Niphates in Book IV he is convinced of both; he recognizes that his misery is his own fault for rejecting

The Mystery of Anastasia Romanov free essay sample

My childhood was an eventful time for me in the form of animated movies. From Disney to Pixar, I was hooked. One very underappreciated movie that I have always kept close to my heart; that movie is Anastasia, by Fox Entertainment. This was a semi-fictional movie that was based off the unsolved mystery of the unsolved mystery of the survival of the youngest daughter of Tsar Nicholas II of Russia, the last sovereign of Imperial Russia, Grand Duchess Anastasia Romanov Nikolaevna. This was one of my first unsolved mysteries I was to encounter in life and the one that stood out the most. Was she really dead? Did she survive and pass on her legacy, leaving descendants behind? Grand Duchess Anastasia was born on June 18, 1901, to the house of Tsar Nicholas II, Emperor and Autocrat of All the Russias. The fourth youngest out of five siblings, she was a mischievous and clever soul with a silver tongue, she always liked to play tricks on her tutors and even went to tripping servants. We will write a custom essay sample on The Mystery of Anastasia Romanov or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page She was very bright and learned very quickly, never dallying in her studies and always seeking to impress. She was a very happy girl who lived a remarkably simple life. Unfortunately, this all changed around 1917. For a revolution was just around the corner. In February 1917, Nicholas II abdicated the throne and Anastasia and her family were placed under house arrest at the Alexander Palace in Tsarskoye Selo during the Russian Revolution. As the Bolsheviks approached, Alexander Kerensky of the Provisional Government had them moved toTobolsk, Siberia. After the Bolsheviks seized majority control of Russia, Anastasia and her family were moved to the Ipatiev House, or House of Special Purpose, at Yekaterinburg. In October of 1917, almost directly after the Bolshevik Revolution, the Russian Civil War broke out. Negotiations for the release of the Romanovs between their Bolshevik (commonly referred to as Reds) captors and their extended family, many of whom were prominent members of the Royal Houses of Europe, stalled. As the Whites (loyalists still faithful to the Tsar and the principles of autocracy) advanced toward Yekaterinburg the Reds were in a precarious situation. The Reds knew Yekaterinburg would fall to the better manned and equipped White Army. When the Whites reached Yekaterinburg, the Imperial Family had simply disappeared. The most widely accepted account was that the family had been murdered. A note found, known as the â€Å"Yurovsky note†, depicted and described what happened to the Russian Imperial family. â€Å"†¦ family was awakened and told to dress. They were told they were being moved to a new location to ensure their safety in anticipation of the violence that might ensue when the White Army reached Yekaterinburg †¦ the family and the small circle of servants who had remained with them were herded into a small room in the houses sub-basement and told to wait †¦After several minutes, the executioners entered the room†¦ Yurovsky quickly informed the Tsar and his family that they were to be executed. The Tsar†¦ was killed by several bullets to the chest†¦Ã¢â‚¬  The rest of the family was slaughtered as well. Now what happened to Anastasia? Anastasias supposed survival was one of the celebrated mysteries of the 20th century. Anna Anderson, the most notorious Anastasia impostor, first surfaced publicly between 1920 and 1922. She contended that she had feigned death amongst the bodies of her family members and servants, and was able to make her escape with the help of a compassionate guard who rescued her from amongst the corpses after noticing that she was still alive. This was later disproved in legal courts, although some relatives and supporters still believed her to be the real Grand Duchess Anastasia. Later in the 1900’s, DNA tests were conducted from Anderson’s body and it was no match to Anastasia’s. Another theory used is that her body was protected by jewels sewn onto her dress. When the Royal Family was in captivity, they were allowed to bring belongings along with them. Some of them were family jewels and precious stones. To make sure that they were hidden from their captors, they sewed them onto the inside of their clothes. Many rumors say those jewels save her life and even saved her sister, Tatiana’s, life. The evidence to support it was in the note. It said the room was so full of smoke from gunfire that nobody could see and the captors left for several minutes. However, this was disproved when Tatiana’s remains were found along with the rest of the royal family. Today, nobody really knows what happened to Anastasia. The movie most definitely proved in a fictional way how she could have survived, although all of the events don’t match up. In conclusion, I hope for the best and pray Anastasia made it out alive. Perhaps she did make it out and she had continued her life in secrecy. This will most likely forever be an unsolved mystery.